Skip to main content

Bull kelp floating on water

Photo Credit: Courtesy of Dr. Sophie McCoy

Bull kelp on shore

Photo Credit: iStock.com | Mickilu

This algae can be found at the Aquarium of the Pacific

Primary ThreatsPrimary Threats Conditions

Threats and Conservation Status

The greatest threats to bull kelp are grazers that consume kelp directly, especially sea urchins, and warming ocean temperatures. In Northern California, a series of events occurred in 2014 to 2015 with devastating results. The sunflower star, an urchin predator, died off (possibly from a virus), allowing its urchin prey to increase dramatically. These large herbivorous urchin populations then overgrazed bull kelp forests, creating extensive barrens. At the same time, a warm ocean water event occurred that impacted the growth of kelp, which requires cold, nutrient-rich water to grow. Together, this double-whammy of stressors caused more than a 90% reduction in bull kelp populations along the coast of Northern California. Because some populations survived, experimental restoration efforts that include transplantation of adults or juveniles, plus the removal of urchins, are underway, with varying success. Dredging and shoreline development can also impact populations.

Abundance of kelp on large scales is typically measured by aerial surveys and remote sensing of canopy area via satellites. Unfortunately, current satellite-based remote sensing does not allow one to distinguish between giant kelp and bull kelp, but this may be possible in the near future. In the meantime, close observations allow biologists to distinguish the species from field or high-resolution aerial surveys; giant kelp is the dominant canopy-forming kelp south of the Big Sur coast, but overlaps extensively with bull kelp into the Monterey Bay. The data thus represent the kelp canopy area detected by remote sensing from San Francisco Bay to the California/Oregon border.

The two striking features from this data are the collapse of the bull kelp canopy in 2014, particularly around Northern California, and the extraordinary variation in populations from year to year. The 13% annual decline since 1999 explains 45% of the variation from 1999 onward, and resulted in the species receiving a strong decline trend.

Population Plots

Data Source: kelpwatch.org

References